Digital solutions for In-situ recovery (ISR) /In-situ leaching (ISL)

Mining
minus

SLB brings proven digital solutions for modeling and optimizing in situ recovery mining processes, enabling operators to better understand subsurface behavior, predict mineral recovery, and optimize leaching performance.

By integrating geology, fluid flow, and geochemistry into a unified modeling framework, the solution transforms ISR operations into a predictive, data-driven workflow, supporting improved field development and operational decision-making.

  • In‑situ leaching (ISL)/recovery (ISR) for critical minerals (uranium, lithium, boron, copper etc.).
  • Well pattern design and injection‑production strategy planning.
  • Modeling of multi-component geochemistry and reactive transport.
  • Operational performance forecasting and recovery optimization.
  • Geomechanics –predict and monitor changes to surface and subsurface due to ISL operations.
  • Robust field management framework to incorporate operational field logic.
  • Uncertainty and optimization for scenario evaluation, well placement, rates and operating conditions.
  • Integration of subsurface and surface workflows for ISR operations.
  • Expansion to broader mining simulation workflows.
Flow icon, blue
Better quantification of critical mineral reserves: Significantly improved resolution of the geological model to better capture variations in porosity and permeability. Essential for flow simulation.
Improved recovery efficiency: Optimized injection and production strategies through advanced physics modeling.
Reduce risk icon, blue
Reduced operational risk: Better understanding of subsurface flow and uncertainty management improves confidence.
Insights icon in blue
Enhanced decision-making: Integrated models provide actionable insights for field development planning.
Conversion path icon, blue
End‑to‑end workflow integration From characterization to calibration and forecasting.
AI enhanced icon, blue
Accelerated innovation: Enables adoption of AI, data-driven workflows, and digital optimization strategies.
  • Integrated modeling of fluid flow, thermodynamics, and geochemical reactions.
  • Ongoing development toward coupling thermal effects with geochemical reactions to better represent temperature-dependent dissolution and reaction kinetics. Integrated modeling of fluid flow, thermodynamics, and geochemical reactions.
  • Flexible physics framework supportingcorrosive injected fluids and PLS behaviour during circulation and lift.
    • Multi-component brines
    • Solid–fluid interactions
    • Chemical reactions and dissolution processes
  • Reactive transport simulation combining flow and chemistry
  • High-resolution 3D subsurface modeling using geological and well data
  • Fracture modeling (dual porosity, discrete fractures, explicit approaches)
  • Customizable workflows using Python scripting for operational control
  • Scalable simulation capability for large, complex models

Traditional ISL workflows rely on simplified simulation tools that limit understanding of subsurface processes and constrain optimization. Our in-situ recovery mining introduces:

  • The capture of complex geochemical reactions governing mineral dissolution.
  • Incorporation of core‑based ISL tests and laboratory measurements to validate geochemical inputs and strengthen model reliability.
  • Integrated characterization, calibration, and forecasting, in one workflow.
  • Enablement of continuous model updates using production and monitoring data including monitoring of porosity and permeability evolution through fiber‑optic measurements or repeat log runs.
  • The ability to run multiple optimized scenarios for improved planning.

This enables a shift from simplified analysis to predictive, data-driven and optimized ISR development.

What it replaces

Our fully integrated, high-fidelity physics-based ISR modeling and optimization workflow replaces:

Check mark
Simplified streamline or reduced-physics simulators.
Check mark
Disconnected tools lacking geochemical modeling capability.
Check mark
Manual or fragmented workflows for ISL planning.
Check mark
Static models with limited predictive capability.
Check mark
Impirical approaches to acid injection design.

In‑situ recovery dissolves minerals underground rather than excavating them, using injection wells to introduce leaching solutions and production wells to recover mineral-rich fluids

The process involves:

  • Complex geochemical reactions (dissolution, oxidation, redox cycles).
  • Interaction between injected fluids, rock matrix, and mineral content.
  • Surface recovery through processing.
  • Management of corrosive lixiviants and PLS throughout the injection‑production cycle is a key operational consideration.

This solution provides a comprehensive digital framework to simulate and optimize these processes, enabling more efficient and sustainable ISR operations. SLB is advancing research into safer lixiviants, including neutral‑pH and alkaline alternatives.